Abstract
Asa Gray made clear the distinction between subgenus and section in the preface of the second edition of hisManual of Botany of the Northern United States (1856). He failed to distinguish between the two infrageneric ranks in the 1848 edition. In 1856, subgenera were published with the symbol § followed by the epithet in capitalized letters while the epithets at sectional rank appear following the symbol § with only the initial letter capitalized. This clarification does not change the nomenclature of the correct name for the subgenus to which the herbaceous-stemmed smilaxes of North America and also eastern Asia belong, and whose subgeneric name isSmilax subgenusLuiste Raf. (1840).
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Brizicky, G. K. 1968. 1805, a proposed starting point for the nomenclature of subgeneric taxa of vascular plants. Taxon 17: 659–660.
— 1969. Subgeneric and sectional names: their starting points and early sources. Taxon 18: 643–659.
Gray, A. 1848. A manual of the botany of the Northern United States, from New England to Wisconsin and south to Ohio and Pennsylvania inclusive. James Munroe & Company, Boston.
— 1856. A manual of the botany of the Northern United States including Virginia, Kentucky and all east of the Mississippi, 2nd edition. George P. Putnam & Co., New York.
Greuter, W. et al. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Regum Vegetabile 138: i-xviii, 1–465.
Stafleu, F. A. &E. G. Voss. 1972. Report on botanical nomenclature, Seattle 1969. Regnum Vegetabile 81: 35–36.
Torrey, J. 1843. A flora of the state of New York. Carroll & Cook, Albany, New York. 2 vols. [Smilax, 2: 302–304. 1843].
Wilbur, R. L. 2004. The subgeneric nomenclature for the herbaceous-stemmedSmilax species (Smilacaceae) of North America. Brittonia 56: 166–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilbur, R.L. Addendum to “The subgeneric nomenclature for the herbaceousstemmedSmilax species (Smilacaceae) of North America” and comments on the problems of infrageneric nomenclature. Brittonia 58, 88–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2006)58[88:ATTSNF]2.0.CO;2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2006)58[88:ATTSNF]2.0.CO;2